Challenges before National Mapping Organisations
Geographic innovation platforms and support network
Over the last few years we have seen significant, global, often disruptive, change in the technological and social environment within which National Mapping Organisations (NMOs) operate. These changes will continue to have profound effects on both: the way geographic information (GI) is captured, managed, traded and used; and the role and function of national mapping agencies.
GI is now part of the mainstream information economy with global players (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and Nokia and other device and service providers) providing common user interfaces to GI both at home and in the workplace. It is now exchanged under global (W3C based) information standards and infl uenced by developments in: wireless, mobile, positioning, sensing, location, imaging, storage and processing technologies. These developments enable GI to be expressed and visualized in 2-, 3- and as 4Dimensions (the temporal dimension) as well as in virtual and augmented reality and increasingly, to be delivered as part of an on-line service. Most profoundly however we have seen a change in the general information model: from a linear, publishing, “push” model to an internetworked, participatory model where users create, share and “mash-up” data using application programming interfaces and open source. Against this background of rapid technological developments the world today faces unprecedented global challenges: sustainable (one planet)
living and working, climate change, aging populations, competition for scarce resources, asymmetric warfare and the effects of globalisation. Tackling these “grand” challenges requires unprecedented local to global collaboration, between governments, businesses, communities and ourselves as individuals. Whilst the technological developments have led to an explosion in the availability of data, captured and served by many, they have made the information management task, in tackling such grand challenges, more complex.
In a world where others can do what we do as national mapping agencies, NMO’s must address the following challenges:
1. Provide geographic information frameworks as a critical means of ordering and managing information complexity, most of which resolves to location or place. This is an essential requirement in enabling local to global collaboration across government, businesses and third sector communities in addressing grand challenges. The recently published UK Location Strategy Place Matters: the Location Strategy for the United Kingdom begins to set out that geographical framework for the Nation. Endorsed by British Ministers phrases such as “In almost everything, people need to know when and where things happen: place matters” are now common place. User generated content can also ordered within these frameworks thus making best use of information collected.
2. Governments globally are increasingly looking to the third sector as a channel of service delivery to their communities. High quality service delivery requires, accurate, current, trusted, and maintained GI as an
ingredient – a role NMOs are familiar with.
3. Provide for ease of use and ease of access to geographic information at users time, point and context of need. Providing the right information at the right time in the right way to meet users’ expectations in a given situation is a requirement of good information service design and one NMO’s are beginning to address.
Whilst the technological developments have led to an explosion in the availability of data, they have made the information management task more complexed.
4. Provide geographic innovation platforms and support networks that
encourage open and user led innovation from communities of users in government, business and the third sector. Both business and social value can be derived from these networks, growing the market for GI and quality of life for a globalised population. Ordnance Survey’s OS OpenSpace is an experiment in just such an innovation platform.
The challenge for NMO’s going forward is to provide the information frameworks, innovation platforms, ease of access and ease of use of accurate maintained geographic information which are needed to address local to global challenges, effi ciently and effectively.
Challenge is how to get our hands on good authoritative data
Despite the economic gloom and challenges currently confronting the whole world, I believe the use of geospatial information will continue to grow, and grow rapidly. Why do I think so? As countries put more people and things into cities, the urbanization of cities will increase the complexity in land usage. As cities become densely populated and well developed with modern infrastructures, we can expect more geospatial information to be available for capture. More help is then needed to manage and analyse the vast information. The content of information also changes over time and that too has to be managed. I can see the transformation happening in Singapore too. Singapore is adding more road and rail infrastructures. More lands are re-developed with higher intensifi cation. We are using the subterranean space more intensely than more. Hence, information over different levels of space (e.g. from subterranean, to ground level and into the airspace) will be captured. In short, the supply of geospatial information will continue to grow in scope and quantity. Information will be in 2-dimensional and even 3- dimensional form. There is also the time dimension of geospatial information to manage. Beyond the cities, there are other geospatial information to manage – natural resources, the environmental issues (such as climate change, water issues) and so on.
The Singapore geospatial story
In Nov 2007, at a similar ESRI user conference in Singapore, I spoke about the importance of geospatial information for decision-making. I shared that the use of geospatial information in the Singapore Public Service has been around for many years, primarily in the security and land planning authorities. Our Land Data Hub,
We must persevere to create a mindset of sharing and responsible usage of geographic information
for instance, was in place since 1989. Today, 15 public agencies are sharing some 125 layers of geospatial information through our network, known as LandNet. Since April 2008, the Singapore Public Service has embarked on a new phase. We have decided to link up the Land Data Hub and 3 other data hubs under a national spatial data infrastructure (NSDI) framework. The other data hubs are repositories of data concerning people, businesses and security matters owned by various public agencies. Hitherto, all the 4 data hubs have been developed and operated independently. In our concept of NSDI, Singapore aims to develop an environment in which public agencies can collaborate and share data more easily. We named our NSDI initiative as the Singapore Geospatial Collaborative Environment, or SG SPACE in short. The implementation of SG SPACE will allow geospatial information from many public sector sources to be shared within a consistent reference framework across the public sector. It is our vision for this initiative to go beyond the public sector to encompass the private and people sector, through licensing and the provision of common goods. The initiative will result in removing duplication of data collection, encouraging re-use of data, and making informed decisions and monitoring. A multi-agency and inclusive committee has been formed to drive and coordinate the various action plans. We hope the strong leadership and governance in the committee is sufficient to drive the changes and implementation. We will be inviting the industry in a few months’ time to help us build a national clearing house for geospatial data. In essence, the clearing house will link up all the 4 hubs that I spoke about earlier. It will provide a gateway for easy discovery and rapid access to geospatial information across the public sector.
One of the goals of SG SPACE is to strengthen our policy formulation and evaluation. We know geospatial information is essential to support our approach to emergencies, environmental challenges (e.g. climate change and water issues), disease management and control, and so on. But we are not just looking inwards. We believe SG SPACE can potentially provide the private and people sector with useful information
that helps them to deliver their products and services better. Hence, we are also building an intelligence map system that is interactive to serve the public better. Besides presenting the public sector information, the intelligence map system can potentially allow individuals and businesses to use some of the public geospatial information via mash-up. All in all, everyone stands to gain in SG SPACE.
There are many challenges facing those developing an NSDI. I shall highlight 2 of them which I believe are not unique to Singapore.
One challenge is how to get our hands on good authoritative data? Authoritative data are those that are closest to the source, authentic and accurate for the functions that they are intended for. Unless we collect all the data ourselves, which is impractical and duplicative, we have to rely on others. However, often the data source owner needs to be thoroughly convinced on our needs before it can agree to provide or share the information. That to me is a reasonable precaution on the part of the data owner. However, sometimes the issue of privacy and security of data could be used conveniently as a reason for not sharing the data. Some of the impediments to sharing are even stipulated by the legislations. Recently, the terrorists who wrecked havoc in Mumbai were reported to have used Google Earth for “location intelligence” and operational planning. This event will undoubtedly reinforce the list of considerations in any future releases of geospatial information. I believe there is no short cut to overcome the impediments to sharing and we must persevere to create a mindset of sharing, and responsible usage. A transparent and collaborative environment is perhaps a good approach to begin.
Another challenge is how to convince decision-makers to invest in geospatial applications and information…. Many decision-makers have not realized that geospatial information is essential to them and their businesses. Having been in the military service for 20 years, I appreciate the value of GIS for operations and analysis. Therefore, it did not take my staff long to convince me that geospatial information is essential to the public service too and the idea led to the birth of SG SPACE.
Excerpts from the address at the ESRI Asia Pacifi c User Conference,
Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre, 20 -21 Jan 2009
|Vanessa Lawrence CB, P Nag, Lam Joon Khoi
NMOs working in isolation are no longer a solution
For any institution challenges are all the time. In the history of institution building challenges are considered to be opportunities. These opportunities are to be encashed in time with right vigor. The institutions have to keep on shifting their focus within their mandates. Same is true for the national mapping organizations (NMOs) in India. If we see the growth patterns of the Indian NMOs, Survey of India and the National Atlas & Thematic Mapping Organisation (NATMO), we will find that former got impetus during the 1961 Indo-China war; and latter after independence when the country required maps different from topographical maps for national reconstruction and planning. Both were challenges during those times.
The issue is whether NMOs can cope up with the everincreasing expectations of the Government and the people at large?
always appreciated by the industry. A new method of sharing responsibility is to be worked out. Some models are being practiced by the NMOs but they are not always foolproof.
The issue is whether NMOs can cope up with the ever-increasing workload and expectations of the Government and the people at large? What kind of control they should exercise? How the responsibility about the quality of the geographic data is to be shared? What should be the model of participating in this national task? How a revenue model is to be worked out? Examples from abroad are often quoted to answer these intricate questions. But the prevailing conditions are not similar.
A serious debate is required in this regard. Even several surveys of geospatial industry conducted recently are silent on this subject. NMOs working in isolation are no longer a solution for India.
Pages: 1 2