<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPS equipment accuracy testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mycoordinates.org/gps-equipment-accuracy-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mycoordinates.org/gps-equipment-accuracy-testing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b7ewmkok</title>
		<link>http://mycoordinates.org/gps-equipment-accuracy-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>b7ewmkok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alltimevideo.co.cc/?p=5269#comment-7</guid>
		<description>How to perform Zero base line test when technology is evolving so fast that the receiver and the antenna are combined &amp; manufactured as a small unit, in the market like Trimble R8, Unistrong E650?

Good reference from Malaysia GPS Cadastral however is not easy to perform known baseline test in Malaysia as baseline is limited. Most of the baselines were created to cater EDM which needs shaded conditions to perform with less refraction by the heats.

Problematic Network
-----------------------------------------------------
JUPEM is a good organization; however the management seems half sleeping.
No new revised official known geodetic network, since in the nineties, beside GDM2000 network which sometime JUPEM&#039;s lower level staff can not able to cope with technical issue, where JUPEM officers are always busy meeting.

Transformation issue
-------------------------------------------------
GDM 2000 is good but still not yet fully practical due to now coming to 10 years delayed in delivery the main purpose of practical usage. No software in Malaysia can convert with assurance and confidently from GDM 2000 to local State Cassini and vice versa in every state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to perform Zero base line test when technology is evolving so fast that the receiver and the antenna are combined &amp; manufactured as a small unit, in the market like Trimble R8, Unistrong E650?</p>
<p>Good reference from Malaysia GPS Cadastral however is not easy to perform known baseline test in Malaysia as baseline is limited. Most of the baselines were created to cater EDM which needs shaded conditions to perform with less refraction by the heats.</p>
<p>Problematic Network<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
JUPEM is a good organization; however the management seems half sleeping.<br />
No new revised official known geodetic network, since in the nineties, beside GDM2000 network which sometime JUPEM&#8217;s lower level staff can not able to cope with technical issue, where JUPEM officers are always busy meeting.</p>
<p>Transformation issue<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
GDM 2000 is good but still not yet fully practical due to now coming to 10 years delayed in delivery the main purpose of practical usage. No software in Malaysia can convert with assurance and confidently from GDM 2000 to local State Cassini and vice versa in every state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

